ResearchWorking PapersTwo-Layer Hormuz Transmission

Working Paper · SSRN · Crisis Extension

Two-Layer Hormuz Transmission

Helium, Semiconductors, and AI Compute Evidence from a High-Dimensional Daily Panel Structure

V5 · available on SSRN
Read the paper →

Published on SSRN before coverage in Foreign Policy, HPCwire, GlobalData, and Epoch AI.

When a Hormuz closure enters market pricing, the visible shock travels fast: energy reprices, LNG freight spikes, volatility rises, and rates and FX adjust within days. That transmission path is well-documented. What is less visible is the second layer. The second layer is slower, harder to price, and structurally different in character.

This paper documents that second layer. Hormuz is the dominant transit corridor for Qatari LNG and, critically, for a significant share of global helium supply. Helium is a non-substitutable industrial input in semiconductor fabrication: cooling systems, fiber-optic production, and chip manufacturing all depend on it. A sustained Hormuz disruption does not only reprice energy. It creates pressure in the helium logistics chain, which then propagates into semiconductor capacity constraints and downstream AI-compute availability.

The framework is built on a public daily panel running from January 2020 to April 2026, covering seventeen series across energy, freight, rates, volatility, semiconductors, and compute infrastructure. The methodology combines local projections for impulse responses, generalized Morse wavelets for multiscale decomposition, scale-by-scale canonical correlation analysis for cross-block dependence, and Monte Carlo tail diagnostics for stress-regime behaviour.

The key empirical result: at the 64-day horizon, the framework identifies a sparse long-horizon bottleneck: a single Brent–SOX direction with a held-out correlation of 0.825. The quarterly structure sharpens rather than disperses. The first transmission layer is immediate and visible. The second layer arrives later, concentrated at horizons that standard daily coverage will not name on day zero.

Why it matters

Standard geopolitical risk analysis stops at energy. This framework shows that the more durable market impact may arrive weeks later through industrial supply chains that connect Hormuz to semiconductor fabs and AI infrastructure. Missing the second layer means mispricing the duration and severity of the transmission.

What is new

The contribution is the two-layer architecture applied to a real daily panel with no synthetic inputs. The long-horizon Brent–SOX bottleneck at the 64-day scale is not a theoretical claim. It is an empirical result extracted from seventeen live series over six years of market data, including the 2023–2024 escalation windows.

Key empirical results

  • Panel window: January 2020 – April 2026, 17 public daily series, no synthetic inputs
  • Transmission layers: Layer 1: immediate (energy, freight, rates, FX, volatility). Layer 2: delayed (helium, semiconductor, compute)
  • Long-horizon bottleneck: Sparse scale-64 Brent–SOX direction, held-out correlation ρ = 0.825
  • Tail frame: 26-week horizon, designed for the quarterly risk window, not only day zero
  • Publication: V5 working paper, SSRN abstract 6776338

Available now

V5 working paper is live on SSRN

SSRN abstract 6776338. Freely available for download and citation.

Download from SSRN →

Want the 1-page transmission brief?

The sharp applied version: what to watch, what the framework says, no equations.

Get the Crisis Brief →

Follow this research

Get notified about research updates.

New versions, extensions, and future papers in the transmission series. No noise.

Research Build

Need data, charts, modeling, or methodology? When the scope moves beyond judgment into evidence, it becomes a Research Build.

The evidence behind the map →

You understand the transmission chain. Want it mapped to your specific exposure? See the Analyst Report →

ShockBridge Pulse Research: market structure, stress transmission, and financial intelligence.